吉他音色比钢琴更加复杂的一个证明

yanfeng

不是没有意义的，这个涉及到声学上的很多问题。 http://www.northernsounds.com/ubb/NonCGI/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=004373 看看他们的争论，很有趣，都是顶尖高手啊。

yanfeng

哈哈，结果出来了！ First of all I want to tank everybody who contributed to this contest; it is very informative and great fun! So here is the final result: we had 14 people with 100% right answers and 18 with one or both wrong! This proves for me how difficult it is to say what is real and what is sampled. You needed me take 1 is REAL You needed me take 2 is the PMI Bosendorfer290 dry patch in Kontakt. Pslam 145 take 1 is the PMI Bosnedorfer 290 Wet and Psalm 145 take 2 is REAL. The free library goes to theSoundSmith who made a very good analysis. Bravo! Please contact me at pmi3@xs4all.nl for your details. The story behind these recordings is this: We recorded several takes of Psalm145. Some were ok, some were better. The best had the real telephone in it. I decided to give our samples a try to "repair" the track. As we recorded with aq Buchla piano bar and pedal contact we had the right midi take so I made the "take 1" recording. The repair went very smooth. Then I decided to give you needed me a try; 10 minutes of switching on Cubase, launching Kontakt and loading the dry sample set. No tweaking on the midi, just a lot of Kontakt reverb. Bounced it to disk and voila there is the ultimate comparison; a raw midi/samples take versus a real acoustic recording. Thanks for joining the fun! My time is up, have to go. Michiel Post

洋葱

这个得奖的thesouthsmith真是太厉害了，他听得出音效的细微差别，对录音技术也很有研究。

yanfeng

那个论坛上很多是职业作曲家，包括给好莱坞干活的。